4.7 Article

Improved model for estimating sidewall effect on the fire heat release rate of horizontal cable tray

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 831-838

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.040

Keywords

Cable tray fire; Wall effect; HRR estimation; HRRPUA; Developed model

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0800100]
  2. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Program of China [202002030124]
  3. Nansha District Artificial Intelligence Application Demonstration Project of China [2019SF10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new model was developed based on small-scale experiments to describe the heat release rate of cable tray fires against sidewalls, showing good agreement with experimental data. The new model accurately reflects the fire risk of cable tray fires, improving understanding of fire hazards in such scenarios.
The occurrence rate of fire events involved with cables is high and a fire hazard analysis is needed. A cable tray may be commonly placed on a wall. The fire hazards of multiple cable trays are affected by the supporting wall to give a higher maximum heat release rate. Taking the wall constraint effect on cable burning into account, a new model for the fire heat release rate of a cable tray fire against a sidewall is developed based on small scale (cone calorimeter) measurements. The newly developed model introduces a constant m to reflect the acceleration in cable burning due to the sidewall. With a properly chosen value of m, the results obtained using the newly developed model agree well with the experimental data. The error in the peak fire heat release rate value is considerably smaller than those of other models. This work improves the understanding of the fire risk of a cable tray with a sidewall. ? 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available