4.7 Article

Adaptations to light contribute to the ecological niches and evolution of the terrestrial avifauna

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0853

Keywords

light; eye; bird; community assembly; niche; evolution

Funding

  1. Katherine Ordway Chair in Ecosystem Conservation at the Florida Museum of Natural History

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the ecological and phylogenetic drivers of eye morphology in terrestrial bird species using measurements from preserved specimens, finding that species with larger eyes are specialized in darker habitats and tropical latitudes. Eye size is a top predictor for habitat, foraging behaviour, diet, and latitude in comparison to other traits.
The role of light in structuring the ecological niche remains a frontier in understanding how vertebrate communities assemble and respond to global change. For birds, eyes represent the primary external anatomical structure specifically evolved to interpret light, yet eye morphology remains understudied compared to movement and dietary traits. Here, I use Stanley Ritland's unpublished measurements of transverse eye diameter from preserved specimens to explore the ecological and phylogenetic drivers of eye morphology for a third of terrestrial avian diversity (N = 2777 species). Species with larger eyes specialized in darker understory and forested habitats, foraging manoeuvres and prey items requiring long-distance optical resolution and were more likely to occur in tropical latitudes. When compared to dietary and movement traits, eye size was a top predictor for habitat, foraging manoeuvre, diet and latitude, adding 8-28% more explanatory power. Eye size was phylogenetically conserved (lambda = 0.90), with phylogeny explaining 61% of eye size variation. I suggest that light has contributed to the evolution and assembly of global vertebrate communities and that eye size provides a useful predictor to assess community response to global change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available