4.7 Article

Simulation of particle fouling characteristics with improved modeling on two different tubes

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 382, Issue -, Pages 398-405

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.004

Keywords

Particle deposition; Eulerian method; Mathematical model; Fouling characteristics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51976028]
  2. Jilin Science-Technology Innovation and Development Plan of China [20190104137]
  3. Jilin Province New Energy Industry School and Enterprise Joint Technological Innovation Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studied the fouling characteristics of micron-scale magnesium oxide particles in circular and converging-diverging tubes. The simulation results showed that the fouling resistance of the converging-diverging tube was smaller than that of the circular tube.
The fouling characteristics of micron-scale magnesium oxide particles on the inside wall of the circular tube and converging-diverging tube are studied in this paper. An improved method for modeling particles in tubes was developed based on the Eulerian method. The particle deposition mechanism of the model includes: diffusion deposition, turbulent deposition, thermophoretic deposition, and gravity deposition. The model was verified by comparison with experimental results from the literature. The effects of particle concentration and flow velocity were studied for two different tubes. The simulation results show that the change rules of the fouling resistance of the two tubes were similar both the asymptotic value of fouling resistance increases with the increase of the concentration, and decreases with the increase of the inlet velocity. By comparing the fouling resistance of the two tubes, it was found that the values of asymptotic fouling resistance of the converging-diverging tube were smaller than that of the circular tube at different concentrations and velocities. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available