4.6 Review

Anticoagulation in COVID-19: current concepts and controversies

Journal

POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 98, Issue 1159, Pages 395-402

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-139923

Keywords

COVID-19; anticoagulation; internal medicine; thromboembolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rising incidence of thromboembolism secondary to COVID-19 has raised concerns globally, with anticoagulants being the primary treatment modality. However, there is lack of universal consensus on the timing, dosage, and duration of anticoagulation in COVID-19.
Rising incidence of thromboembolism secondary to COVID-19 has become a global concern, with several surveys reporting increased mortality rates. Thrombogenic potential of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been hypothesised to originate from its ability to produce an exaggerated inflammatory response leading to endothelial dysfunction. Anticoagulants have remained the primary modality of treatment of thromboembolism for decades. However, there is no universal consensus regarding the timing, dosage and duration of anticoagulation in COVID-19 as well as need for postdischarge prophylaxis. This article seeks to review the present guidelines and recommendations as well as the ongoing trials on use of anticoagulants in COVID-19, identify discrepancies between all these, and provide a comprehensive strategy regarding usage of these drugs in the current pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available