4.7 Article

Poly (4-styrenesulfonic acid): A recoverable and reusable catalyst for acid hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123620

Keywords

Recycling; Hydrolysis; Sustainability; Polyesters; PET; TPA; Acid catalysis; PSSA

Funding

  1. Polymer Institute
  2. Polyester and Barrier Consortium at the University of Toledo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly (4-styrenesulfonic acid) (PSSA) was utilized as a recoverable acid catalyst for hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) to terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG). The PSSA system exhibited faster hydrolysis kinetics than H2SO4 with better surface wetting of PET and higher localized concentration of protons. Reutilization and titration results indicated that PSSA maintained activity after five reaction cycles.
Poly (4-styrenesulfonic acid) (PSSA) was used as a recoverable acid catalyst for the hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) to terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG). The effect of catalyst concentration, time, and temperature on the depolymerization of PET and yield of TPA were determined with PSSA and H2SO4. The PSSA system exhibited faster hydrolysis kinetics than H2SO4 with a shorter induction period than those often observed for acid hydrolysis of PET. The activation energies for the hydrolysis of PET were 24.8 kJ mol-1 and 29.1 kJ mol-1 for 2 M PSSA and 2 M H2SO4, respectively. The hydrophobic backbone of PSSA improves surface wetting of the catalyst solution at the PET interface, resulting in a higher localized concentration of protons. Contact angle measurements indicated better surface wetting of PET films by the aqueous solutions of PSSA than H2SO4 at equal concentrations. Additionally, the reutilization and titration results indicated that PSSA maintained the activity after reuse for five reaction cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available