4.6 Article

Recovery of dynamic stability during slips unaffected by arm swing in people with Parkinson's Disease

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249303

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2016-04928]
  2. NSERC [RGPAS 493045-2016]
  3. Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science Early Researcher Award [16-12-206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the role of arm elevation strategy in slips among individuals with Parkinson's Disease, with findings indicating that the impact of arm swing on stability restoration remains unexplored in this population. Additionally, asymmetrical impairments in slip recovery response were observed among participants, suggesting potential challenges in restoring stability after slips in this group.
The arm elevation strategy assists in recovering stability during slips in healthy young and elderly individuals. However, in people with Parkinson's Disease, one of the main motor symptoms affecting the upper limbs is reduced arm swing which intensifies throughout the course of the disease before becoming absent. This holds direct implications for these individuals when encountering slips as the arm elevation strategy is an integral component in the interlimb slip response to restore stability. Arm swing's effect in recovering from slips in people with Parkinson's Disease though remains unexamined. Twenty people with Parkinson's Disease (63.78 +/- 8.97 years) walked with restricted and unrestricted arm swing conditions on a dual-belt treadmill where slips were induced on the least and most affected sides. Data were collected on the CAREN Extended System (Motek Medical, Amsterdam, NL). The Margin of Stability, linear and angular trunk velocities, as well as step length, time, and width were calculated. Data were examined during the slipped step and recovery step. The restricted arm swing condition, compared to unrestricted, caused a faster step time during the slipped step. Compared to the most affected leg, the least affected had a wider step width during the slipped step. During the recovery step, the least affected leg had a larger anteroposterior Margin of Stability and longer step time than the most affected. No differences between our arm swing conditions suggests that the normal arm swing in our participants was not more effective at restoring stability after an induced slip compared to when their arm motion was restricted. This may be due to the arm elevation strategy being ineffective in counteracting the slip's backward destabilization in these individuals. Differences between the legs revealed that our participants were asymmetrically impaired in their slip recovery response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available