4.6 Article

Features of the EEDF formation in the dusty plasma of the positive column of a glow discharge

Journal

PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/abef16

Keywords

dusty plasma; Boltzmann equation; low-temperature plasma; electron kinetics; electron energy distribution function

Funding

  1. [FZNZ-20200002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the formation of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) in argon dusty plasma at low pressure, finding that dust has little effect on EEDF. The spatial profiles of the fields should be chosen carefully when obtaining the nonlocal EEDF. Significant changes in the nonlocal EEDF at the discharge periphery are observed.
In this paper, the formation of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) in the argon dusty plasma of the positive column of glow discharge at low pressure is investigated. A model for calculating EEDF in the local approximation is adapted to find the nonlocal EEDF via the Holstein-Tsendin model. The results show that, contrary to the prevalent opinion in the literature, the presence of dust has little effect on the EEDF up to the limiting values of the density of dust particles that can be injected into the plasma for the considered conditions. It is also shown that, when obtaining the nonlocal EEDF, the spatial profiles of the axial (heating) and radial (ambipolar) fields should be chosen from a self-consistent solution. Additionally, the differences between the local and nonlocal EEDFs increase in the peripheral regions of the discharge due to a sharp decrease of fast electrons in the nonlocal case. Significant changes in the form of the nonlocal EEDF along the radius also lead to noticeable changes in other characteristics of the electrons in this area, especially for those with a large energy threshold (e.g. due to excitation, ionization).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available