4.7 Article

Genome wide identification and characterization of abiotic stress responsive lncRNAs in Capsicum annuum

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 221-236

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.031

Keywords

Long non-coding RNA; Capsicum annuum; Abiotic stress; microRNA; Target mimic; Transcription factor

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board [ECR/2017/000710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long non-coding RNAs in Capsicum annuum tissues interact with miRNAs to regulate stress responsive transcription factors and participate in modulating biological processes under different abiotic stress conditions.
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a type of non-coding transcripts having length of more than 200 nucleotides lacking protein-coding ability. In the present study, 12807 lncRNAs were identified in Capsicum annuum tissues exposed to abiotic stress conditions viz. heat, cold, osmotic and salinity stress. Expression analysis of lncRNAs in different treatment conditions demonstrates their stress-specific expression. Thirty lncRNAs were found to act as precursors for 10 microRNAs (miRNAs) of C. annuum. Additionally, a total of 1807 lncRNAs were found to interact with 194 miRNAs which targeted 621 mRNAs of C. annuum. Among these, 344 lncRNAs were found to act as target mimics for 621 genes. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed that out of those 621 gene sequences, 546 were tagged with GO terms, 105 Enzyme Code (EC) numbers were assigned to 246 genes and 223 genes are found to be involved in 63 biological pathways. In this report, we have highlighted the prospective role of lncRNAs in different abiotic stress conditions by interacting with miRNAs and regulating stress responsive transcription factors (TFs) such as DoF, WRKY, MYB, bZIP and ERF in C. annuum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available