4.7 Article

Simulation of aerosol transmission on a Boeing 737 airplane with intervention measures for COVID-19 mitigation

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0044720

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying economically viable intervention measures to reduce COVID-19 transmission on aircraft is crucial, especially with the emergence of new SARS-CoV2 variants. Using computational simulations, it was found that employing sneeze shields on full capacity flights can significantly reduce aerosol transmission compared to reduced capacity flights without shields.
Identifying economically viable intervention measures to reduce COVID-19 transmission on aircraft is of critical importance especially as new SARS-CoV2 variants emerge. Computational fluid-particle dynamic simulations are employed to investigate aerosol transmission and intervention measures on a Boeing 737 cabin zone. The present study compares aerosol transmission in three models: (a) a model at full passenger capacity (60 passengers), (b) a model at reduced capacity (40 passengers), and (c) a model at full capacity with sneeze guards/shields between passengers. Lagrangian simulations are used to model aerosol transport using particle sizes in the 1-50 mu m range, which spans aerosols emitted during breathing, speech, and coughing. Sneeze shields placed between passengers redirect the local air flow and transfer part of the lateral momentum of the air to longitudinal momentum. This mechanism is exploited to direct more particles to the back of the seats in front of the index patient (aerosol source) and reduce lateral transfer of aerosol particles to other passengers. It is demonstrated that using sneeze shields on full capacity flights can reduce aerosol transmission to levels below that of reduced capacity flights without sneeze shields. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available