4.7 Article

Transmission and generation investment in electricity markets: The effects of market splitting and network fee regimes

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 254, Issue 2, Pages 493-509

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.044

Keywords

Electricity market modeling; Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization; Multilevel programming; Network expansion; Transmission management

Funding

  1. Aufbruch Bayern (Bavaria on the move) initiative of the state of Bavaria [D7-F2421.4.3/9/2]
  2. Emerging Field Initiative (EFI) of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg through the project Sustainable Business Models in Energy Markets (EFO) [RW01]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [A05, B07, Sonderforschungsbereich/Transregio 154]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose an equilibrium model that allows to analyze the long-run impact of the electricity market design on transmission line expansion by the regulator and investment in generation capacity by private firms in liberalized electricity markets. The model incorporates investment decisions of the transmission system operator and private firms in expectation of an energy-only market and cost-based redispatch. In different specifications we consider the cases of one vs. multiple price zones (market splitting) and analyze different approaches to recover network cost in particular lump sum, generation capacity based, and energy based fees. In order to compare the outcomes of our multilevel market model with a first best benchmark, we also solve the corresponding integrated planner problem. Using two test networks we illustrate that energy-only markets can lead to suboptimal locational decisions for generation capacity and thus imply excessive network expansion. Market splitting heals these problems only partially. These results are valid for all considered types of network tariffs, although investment slightly differs across those regimes. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available