4.7 Article

Resonance behaviors in periodic viscoelastic electrokinetic flows: A universal Deborah number

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0046861

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11902165, 11772162]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China [2019BS01004]
  3. Inner Mongolia Grassland Talent [12000-12102408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the electrokinetic transports of viscoelastic fluids in various channel geometries and introduces a universal Deborah number to analyze resonances. It is found that the annular geometry is optimal for achieving maximum energy conversion efficiency compared to cylindrical geometry, with a 20% increase in efficiency.
The electrokinetic transports of viscoelastic fluids are investigated in different channel geometries. The fluid elasticity is responsible for the generation of resonance behaviors under periodic pressure gradient driving. We introduce a universal Deborah number defined by the surface-to-volume ratio of the channel, and thereby a critical value De(c) = 1/4 can be applied to different channel geometries. Above this threshold, the resonances occur at particular frequencies and result in a dramatic increase in the amplitudes of the flow rate, streaming potential, and energy conversion efficiency. The locations of resonant peaks are determined by the ratio of the effective characteristic size of the channel to the wavelength of viscoelastic shear waves. Interestingly, in the annular geometry with small effective size, even order resonances are suppressed significantly relative to odd order resonances. For the maximum energy conversion efficiency in steady flows in different geometries, we find that the annular geometry is optimal, which has a 20% increase in the maximum efficiency compared to the cylindrical geometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available