4.7 Article

Scaling of the mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress in turbulent plane jet

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0043953

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration [89233218CNA000001]
  2. [20210298ER]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proper scaling for the mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress in a turbulent plane jet was determined using a scaling patch approach. The developed approximation functions for the scaled mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress were found to agree well with experimental and numerical data. Similarities and differences between the scales of the mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress in turbulent plane jets and zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flows were clarified.
Proper scaling for the mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress in a turbulent plane jet is determined using a scaling patch approach. By seeking an admissible scaling, a key concept in the scaling patch approach, for the mean continuity equation, a proper scale for the mean transverse flow in a turbulent plane jet is found as V ref = - delta d U ctr / d x, where delta is the jet half width and d U ctr / d x is the decay rate of the mean axial velocity at the jet centerline. By seeking an admissible scaling for the mean axial momentum equation, a proper scale for the kinematic Reynolds shear stress is found as R u v , ref = U ctr V ref, which is a mix of the velocity scales in the axial and transverse directions. Approximation functions for the scaled mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress are developed and found to agree well with experimental and numerical data. Similarities and differences between the scales of the mean transverse flow and Reynolds shear stress in turbulent plane jets and zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flows are clarified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available