4.2 Article

Influence of symptom frequency and severity on hip abductor strength and endurance in individuals with patellofemoral pain

Journal

PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 83-89

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.02.001

Keywords

Muscle strength; Physical endurance; Symptomatology; Knee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that individuals with more severe and frequent patellofemoral pain have significantly weaker hip abductor strength and endurance, as well as poorer dynamic endurance compared to those with less pronounced symptoms.
Objective: To compare clinical measures of hip abductor strength and endurance of individuals with patellofemoral pain with more severe symptoms to those with less severe symptoms. Design: Cross-sectional. Settings: Laboratory. Participants: Sixty participants with patellofemoral pain were divided three times into 2 groups according to three symptomatology criteria: functional capacity, pain frequency and pain severity. Main outcome measures: Isometric strength evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer, endurance using maximum number of repetitions and maximum holding time, functional capacity using the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, pain frequency using a 2-category scale (?Less frequent? = 1-2 times a week; ?More frequent? = >3 times a week) and pain severity using Numeric Pain Rating Scales. Results: Participants with more frequent symptoms and with more severe pain were significantly weaker (10%, p = 0.04 and 16%, p = 0.001, respectively), and had less isometric (17%, p = 0.02 and 24%, p = 0.002, respectively) and dynamic (13%, p = 0.02 and 23%, p = 0.007, respectively) endurance compared to those with less pronounced symptoms. Conclusion: Our study highlighted that hip abductor strength and endurance deficits are more pronounced in individuals with more severe and frequent pain. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available