4.8 Article

First Simultaneous Acceleration of Multiple Charge States of Heavy Ion Beams in a Large-Scale Superconducting Linear Accelerator

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 126, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.114801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-SC0000661]
  2. State of Michigan
  3. Michigan State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experimental studies focused on the simultaneous acceleration of three-charge-state Xe-129(49)+, 50+(,51+) beam from 17 to 180 MeV/nucleon in a superconducting linear accelerator. The results showed that recombination of three charge states in the six-dimensional phase space increased the xenon beam intensity by 2.5-fold compared to the single-charge-state beam, validating the potential to produce and utilize high-quality multiple-charge-state heavy-ion beams in a large-scale superconducting linac to increase beam power for isotope production targets.
Experimental studies of the simultaneous acceleration of three-charge-state Xe-129(49)+,50+(,51+) beam from 17 to 180 MeV/nucleon in a superconducting linear accelerator are presented. The beam parameters for each individual- and multiple-charge-state beam were measured and compared with the particle tracking simulations. Detailed measurements were performed to characterize the multiple-charge-state beam's recombination after a second-order achromat and isopath 180 degrees bending system. As a result of the recombination of three charge states in the six-dimensional phase space, the xenon beam intensity was increased by 2.5-fold compared to the single-charge-state beam. The results presented in the Letter fully validate the possibility to produce and utilize high-quality multiple-charge-state heavy-ion beams in a large-scale superconducting linac to increase the available beam power on an isotope production target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available