A role for magnetic susceptibility in synthetic computed tomography

Purpose: Radiotherapy treatment planning based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) benefits from increased soft-tissue contrast and functional imaging. MRI-only planning is attractive but limited by the lack of electron density information required for dose calculation, and the difficulty to differentiate air and bone. MRI can map magnetic susceptibility to separate bone from air. A method is introduced to produce synthetic CT (sCT) through automatic voxel-wise assignment of CT numbers from an MRI dataset processed that includes magnetic susceptibility mapping. Methods: Volumetric multi-echo gradient echo datasets were acquired in the heads of five healthy volunteers and fourteen patients with cancer using a 3 T MRI system. An algorithm for CT synthesis was designed using the volunteer data, based on fuzzy c-means clustering and adaptive thresholding of the MR data (magnitude, fat, water, and magnetic susceptibility). Susceptibility mapping was performed using a modified version of the iterative phase replacement algorithm. On patient data, the algorithm was assessed by direct comparison to X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: The skull, spine, teeth, and major sinuses were clearly distinguished in all sCT, from healthy volunteers and patients. The mean absolute CT number error between X-ray CT and sCT in patients ranged from 78 and 134 HU. Conclusion: Susceptibility mapping using MRI can differentiate air and bone for CT synthesis. The proposed method is automated, fast, and based on a commercially available MRI pulse sequence. The method avoids registration errors and does not rely on a priori information, making it suitable for nonstandard anatomy.

Automated summary

This study introduces a method for generating synthetic CT using MRI-based susceptibility mapping to differentiate bone from air. The experiment successfully distinguished the skull, spine, teeth, and major sinuses in sCT from healthy volunteers and patients. The mean absolute CT number error between X-ray CT and sCT in patients ranged moderately, showing the potential of the proposed method for clinical applications.