4.2 Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotyping for HLA-B*15:02 in Indonesian patients with epilepsy using a generic model

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 476-483

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00225-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Human Genome Research Institute [U01HG007269]
  2. Directorate of Higher Education, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia by World Class Professor Program [123.56/D2.3/KP/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HLA-B*15:02 screening before prescribing CBZ to epilepsy patients in Indonesia is not cost-effective according to the cost-effectiveness model, but the positive outcomes in other Asian countries may influence the desirability of implementation in Indonesia despite the suboptimal cost-effectiveness.
Carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are strongly associated with the HLA-B*15:02 allele. Screening HLA-B*15:02 before CBZ administration might prevent CBZ-induced SJS/TEN by enabling clinicians to prescribe alternative therapy for positive patients. Similar to other Southeastern Asian countries, HLA-B*15:02 is highly prevalent in Indonesia. Therefore, we assessed the economic value of HLA-B*15:02 screening before CBZ prescription to patients with epilepsy in Indonesia. A generic cost-effectiveness model and decision support tool, developed to enable users to perform an initial cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare provider/payer perspective, were used to assess the value of HLA-B*15:02 genotyping. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adopting universal HLA-B*15:02 screening was 656,444,671 Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for patients compared with 2,634,975,574 IDR/QALY gained for providing valproic acid (alternative drug) without screening. Thus, neither HLA-B*15:02 screening nor substitution with VPA meets the Indonesian threshold for cost effectiveness. However, the improved outcomes with this test in other Asian countries may inform the desirability of implementation in Indonesia even with suboptimal cost-effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available