4.2 Article

Posttraumatic growth and positive determinants in nursing students after COVID-19 alarm status: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Journal

PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 1876-1887

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12761

Keywords

COVID-19; education curriculum; nursing student; pandemic; psychological flexibility; psychological resilience

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the relationship between posttraumatic growth (PTG), psychological flexibility, and psychological resilience of nursing students after the COVID-19 alarm status. It found that psychological flexibility had a significant impact on psychological resilience, while its effect on PTG was smaller.
Purpose To determine the relationship between posttraumatic growth (PTG), psychological flexibility, and psychological resilience of nursing students after the COVID-19 alarm status. Design and Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with nursing students (N = 292) studying at a nursing school of a university. The data collection instruments included a form on descriptive variables, and the PTG, psychological flexibility, and psychological resilience scales. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t test, ANOVA, correlation, simple, and hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to analyze the data. Findings The mean scores regarding psychological flexibility, psychological resilience, and PTG were 27.56 +/- 11.06, 18.10 +/- 5.75, and 63.49 +/- 20.64, respectively. While psychological flexibility explained 36.7% of the total variance in psychological resilience, the predictive effect of seven descriptive variables, including psychological flexibility and psychological resilience, on PTG was determined as 13.4%. Practice Implications PTG, psychological flexibility, and psychological resilience may help nursing students prepare for their transition to the profession.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available