4.1 Article

Impact of Regular Physical Activity on Aortic Diameter Progression in Paediatric Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Journal

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1133-1140

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02591-4

Keywords

Bicuspid aortic valve; Aortopathy; Echocardiography; Paediatrics; Exercise

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study of paediatric BAV patients, regular physical activity did not significantly affect aortic dilation progression over a 2-year period, indicating that the impact of exercise on aortic diameters in BAV patients remains unclear.
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have an increased risk of aortic dilation and aortic dissection or rupture. The impact of physical training on the natural course of aortopathy in BAV patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular physical activity on aortic diameters in a consecutive cohort of paediatric patients with BAV. Consecutive paediatric BAV patients were evaluated and categorized into two groups: physically active and sedentary subjects. Only the subjects with a complete 2-year follow-up were included in the study. To evaluate the potential impact of physical activity on aortic size, aortic diameters were measured at the sinus of Valsalva and mid-ascending aorta using echocardiography. We defined aortic diameter progression the increase of aortic diameter >= 10% from baseline. Among 90 BAV patients (11.5 +/- 3.4 years of age, 77% males), 53 (59%) were physically active subjects. Compared to sedentary, physically active subjects were not significantly more likely to have > 10% increase in sinus of Valsalva (13% vs. 8%, p-value = 0.45) or mid-ascending aorta diameter (9% vs. 13%, p-value = 0.55) at 2 years follow-up, both in subjects with sinus of Valsalva diameter progression (3.7 +/- 1.0 mm vs. 3.5 +/- 0.8 mm, p-value = 0.67) and in those with ascending aorta diameter progression (3.0 +/- 0.8 mm vs. 3.2 +/- 1.3 mm, p-value = 0.83). In our paediatric cohort of BAV patients, the prevalence and the degree of aortic diameter progression was not significantly different between physically active and sedentary subjects, suggesting that aortic dilation is unrelated to regular physical activity over a 2-year period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available