4.1 Article

Pediatric Glial Tumors

Journal

PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 46-58

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10935266211009101

Keywords

molecular pathology; immunohistochemistry; neuropathology; pediatric; surg path; tumors; glioma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pediatric glial tumors have unique differences from adult glial tumors, with the integration of molecular information playing a significant role in prognosis and treatment implications. Given the complexity of the field, a practical approach to diagnosis involving molecular surrogate immunohistochemical stains and basic molecular studies is essential.
Pediatric glial tumors are unique from their adult counterparts. This important distinction is recognized and incorporated into the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors and applies to both high- and low-grade gliomas, incorporating their specific molecular profiles. Molecular alterations in pediatric high-grade gliomas provide important prognostic information, for example in H3 K27M-mutant tumors. The integration of molecular information is also important for pediatric low-grade gliomas due to their overlapping morphologies and the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these molecular alterations. In this paper, we cover a variety of glial tumors, encompassing neoplasms with predominantly glial histology, astrocytic tumors, oligodendroglial tumors, and mixed glioneuronal tumors. Considering the complexity of this evolving field, the purpose of this article is to offer a practical approach to the diagnosis of pediatric gliomas, including the selection of the most appropriate molecular surrogate immunohistochemical stains, basic molecular studies, and more sophisticated techniques if needed. The goal is to reach a rapid, sound diagnosis, helping guide clinical decision-making regarding prognosis and potential therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available