4.5 Review

Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 104, Issue 11, Pages 2682-2699

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.006

Keywords

Telehealth; Ehealth; Telemedicine; Supportive cancer care; Allied health; Quality of care; Patient centred care

Funding

  1. La Trobe University Internal Grant [RFA 3.25.10.02.19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telehealth services for cancer supportive care require consideration of patient characteristics, healthcare provider characteristics, and skill gaps. The capacity and willingness of services to adapt to telehealth in the context of COVID-19 have been acknowledged, but there is a need to assess the impact of the transition on service quality.
Objective: To investigate what factors need consideration for telehealth services for cancer supportive care, given the rapid transition to telehealth as a result of COVID-19. Methods: A scoping review and a review of current guidance and guidelines provided by professional bodies, representing relevant discipline groups for cancer supportive care, were conducted. Results: We identified 19 papers and 23 telehealth guidance documents. The results highlight how the characteristics of patient group and healthcare provider influence the acceptability and utility of the service and establish a minimum set of preconditions. The reviews primarily examined patient-focused difficulties or issues with acceptability and efficacy, with only a minority highlighting how provider issues might also be implicated. By contrast, the guidance and guidelines described a need to address skills gaps in providing and receiving support through telehealth. Conclusion: The capacity and willingness of services to adapt, in the context of COVID-19, is reassuring. It is important that the impact of the move to telehealth on service quality is assessed and systems put in place to ensure sustainability, acceptability, and adaptability. Practice implications: Key recommendations can be made to assist service telehealth optimisation, many of which apply irrespective of the specific service focus. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available