4.6 Article

Estimates of the population size and dispersal range of Anopheles arabiensis in Northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: implications for a planned pilot programme to release sterile male mosquitoes

Journal

PARASITES & VECTORS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04674-w

Keywords

Malaria vector control; Malaria elimination; Male mosquitoes; Population size; Over-flooding ratio; Sterile insect technique

Funding

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency through their technical cooperation programme [SAF5014, 17904, 17953, 19099]
  2. Department of Science and Technology through their Health Innovation Scheme
  3. Global Diseases Detection/CDC Grant [U19GH000622-01 MAL01]
  4. National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Medical Faculty Research Endowment Fund [00140184612015121105RMVIRL015]
  5. DST/NRF South African Research Chairs Initiative grant
  6. NRF [119765, 107428]
  7. University of Glasgow [AV/PP0027/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimated the population size of male Anopheles arabiensis and the dispersal of released males in a targeted area for a pilot sterile male release program. The results showed that the population size of An. arabiensis varied between 550 and 9500 males per hectare, depending on time of year, weather conditions, and method used. The average dispersal distance of marked males ranged from 58 to 86 meters, and marked males were found in swarms with wild males, indicating their ability to participate in mating swarms.
Background Anopheles arabiensis is a major malaria vector, recently implicated as contributing to ongoing residual malaria transmission in South Africa, which feeds and rests both indoors and outdoors. This species is, therefore, not effectively targeted using core malaria vector control interventions alone. Additionally, increasing resistance to available insecticides necessitates investigations into complementary non-insecticide-based vector control methods for outdoor-resting mosquitoes. The feasibility of the sterile insect technique (SIT) as a complementary vector control intervention is being investigated in South Africa. Successful implementation of an SIT programme largely depends on inundating a target insect population with sterilized laboratory-bred males. Therefore, knowledge of the native population size and dispersal ability of released sterile laboratory-reared males is critical. In this study, we estimated the male An. arabiensis population size and the dispersal of released males in an area targeted for a pilot sterile male release programme. Methods Three separate releases were performed within a 2-year period. Approximately 5000-15,000 laboratory-reared male An. arabiensis (KWAG) were produced and marked for mark-release-recapture experiments. To recapture released mosquitoes, cloth tubes were deployed in widening concentric circles. The average dispersal distance of released males was calculated and the wild male An. arabiensis population size was estimated using two Lincoln index formulae. The natural population was sampled concurrently and Anopheles species diversity examined. Results The Anopheles gambiae complex and An. funestus group species made up the majority of wild collections along with other anophelines. The An. arabiensis population size was estimated to be between 550 and 9500 males per hectare depending on time of year, weather conditions and method used. Average dispersal distance of marked males ranged from 58 to 86 m. Marked males were found in swarms with wild males, indicating that laboratory-reared males are able to locate and participate in mating swarms. Conclusions It was logistically feasible to conduct mark-release-recapture studies at the current scale. The population size estimates obtained may provide a guideline for the initial number of males to use for a pending SIT pilot trial. It is promising for future SIT trials that laboratory-reared marked males participated in natural swarms, appearing at the right place at the right time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available