4.3 Review

Potential Roles of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Cellular Proteins Implicated in Diabesity

Journal

OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8830880

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of High Education, Malaysia, via the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [203/PPSP/6171215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintaining ER homeostasis is crucial for normal cellular function, and an imbalance can lead to unfolded protein response. Factors like chronic hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and inflammatory cytokines may trigger ER stress and be associated with diabesity.
The role of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has evolved from protein synthesis, processing, and other secretory pathways to forming a foundation for lipid biosynthesis and other metabolic functions. Maintaining ER homeostasis is essential for normal cellular function and survival. An imbalance in the ER implied stressful conditions such as metabolic distress, which activates a protective process called unfolded protein response (UPR). This response is activated through some canonical branches of ER stress, i.e., the protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (IRE1 alpha), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Therefore, chronic hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, increased proinflammatory cytokines, and free fatty acids (FFAs) found in diabesity (a pathophysiological link between obesity and diabetes) could lead to ER stress. However, limited data exist regarding ER stress and its association with diabesity, particularly the implicated proteins and molecular mechanisms. Thus, this review highlights the role of ER stress in relation to some proteins involved in diabesity pathogenesis and provides insight into possible pathways that could serve as novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available