4.4 Article

Approximation algorithms for the multiprocessor scheduling with submodular penalties

Journal

OPTIMIZATION LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 2165-2180

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-021-01724-1

Keywords

Multiprocessor scheduling; Submodular penalties; Approximation algorithm

Funding

  1. Program for Excellent Young Talents of Yunnan University
  2. Key Joint Project of the Science and Technology Department of Yunnan Province [2018FY001(-014)]
  3. Yunnan University [2018FY001(-014)]
  4. Training Program of National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, IRTSTYN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses multiprocessor scheduling with submodular penalties, aiming to minimize the sum of makespan and rejection penalty by finding a subset of rejected jobs and assigning others to machines. Non-combinatorial and combinatorial algorithms are proposed for worst-case guarantee and special case scenarios, respectively.
In this paper, we consider multiprocessor scheduling with submodular penalties to extend multiprocessor scheduling with rejection to submodular function. An instance of the problem is given by n jobs and m machines with each job having a certain processing time on a machine. We aim to find a subset R of rejected jobs, and assign each of other jobs to one of the m machines. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of the m machines and the rejection penalty R, where the rejection penalty is determined by a submodular function. For this problem, we design a non-combinatorial Lovasz rounding algorithm that achieves a worst-case guarantee of 3+52. Then, we consider a special case of this problem in which all the machines are identical, i.e. each job has the same processing time on any machine, and we design a combinatorial (2-1m-approximation algorithm based on the greedy method and list scheduling (LS) algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available