4.4 Article

Computer vision syndrome in presbyopic digital device workers and progressive lens design

Journal

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 922-931

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12832

Keywords

computer vision syndrome; digital devices; presbyopia; progressive addition lenses; workers

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Education, Research, Culture and Sports, Valencian Government [GV/2017/187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that presbyopic desktop computer workers wearing occupational lenses have reduced computer vision syndrome (CVS) compared with PALs, especially in emmetropes.
Purpose To estimate the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) in presbyopic digital device workers using two ophthalmic progressive lens designs during the working day, and to analyse the association of CVS with sociodemographic, occupational, digital device exposure and refractive factors. Methods This time series, quasi-experimental design study included 69 presbyopic digital device workers (age range: 46-69 years; mean +/- SD = 54.7 +/- 5.0). All used desktop computers at their workplace. Progressive addition lenses (PALs) and occupational lenses were used for three months each. CVS was measured with the CVS-Q(C) questionnaire before intervention (baseline) and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after wearing the lenses. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that were associated with an improved CVS-Q(C) score. Results 37.7% of the subjects were female and 78.3% were ametropes; 65.2% had advanced presbyopia. 56.2% used digital devices at work >6 h day(-1). The prevalence of CVS at baseline, after wearing PALs for three months and after three months of occupational lens wear was 68.1%, 33.3% and 18.8%, respectively. The mean CVS-Q(C) score was lower with occupational lenses than with PALs (p = 0.001). 40.6% of the digital device workers improved their CVS-Q(C) score >= 2 points with the occupational lenses. Ametropes were less likely than emmetropes to improve with occupational lenses (OR = 0.27, p = 0.05). 89.8% of the sample workers were satisfied or very satisfied with the occupational lenses and 71% were similarly satisfied with the PALs. 73.9% chose the occupational lenses as their first choice of lens for digital device use, compared with 17.4% for PALs. Conclusions Computer vision syndrome is reduced in presbyopic desktop computer workers wearing occupational lenses compared with PALs, especially in emmetropes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available