4.7 Article

Robust compound Poisson parameter estimation for inventory control

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2021.102481

Keywords

Inventory control; Forecasting; Probability; Compound Poisson demand

Funding

  1. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [019.191SG.003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing methods for estimating parameters in inventory control lack guidance, with traditional MM and ML estimators proving to be less robust. We propose a new MM alternative that outperforms standard methods in accuracy and performance.
Most companies store demand data periodically and make periodic demand forecasts, whereas many demand processes in inventory control need parameter estimates at the individual customer level. Guidance on estimating the parameters of a continuous-time demand process from period demand data is lacking, in particular for the popular and well-studied compound Poisson class of demand. Whereas the statistics literature typically focuses on asymptotic properties, parameters for inventory control have to be estimated based on a limited number of periodic historical demand observations. We show that the standard Method-of-Moments (MM) estimator - the default choice in applied inventory control research - is severely biased for finite samples. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimator - which needs to be obtained by a numerical search - performs better, but both estimators lack robustness to misspecification of the demand size distribution. We propose an intuitive, consistent, closed-form MM alternative that dominates standard MM and ML in terms of estimation accuracy and on-target inventory performance. Its closed form does not depend on the specific demand size distribution, making it robust and easily applicable in large-scale applications with many items. In a case study, we find that the accuracy loss due to storing demand periodically is four times as high under standard MM as under the proposed estimator. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available