4.5 Article

The genetic regulation of avian migration timing: combining candidate genes and quantitative genetic approaches in a long-distance migrant

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 196, Issue 2, Pages 373-387

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04930-x

Keywords

Annual cycle; CLOCK; Heritability; Migration; Phenology

Categories

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [17-24782S, 20-00648S]
  2. Palacky University Grant scheme [IGA_PrF_2021_010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that four candidate genes had no consistent effect on the timing of migration in collared flycatchers, with most of the variability in male spring arrival date attributable to permanent environmental effects. Additive genetic variance and heritability were found to be very low, which may constrain species evolutionary adaptation.
Plant and animal populations can adapt to prolonged environmental changes if they have sufficient genetic variation in important phenological traits. The genetic regulation of annual cycles can be studied either via candidate genes or through the decomposition of phenotypic variance by quantitative genetics. Here, we combined both approaches to study the timing of migration in a long-distance migrant, the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). We found that none of the four studied candidate genes (CLOCK, NPAS2, ADCYAP1 and CREB1) had any consistent effect on the timing of six annual cycle stages of geolocator-tracked individuals. This negative result was confirmed by direct observations of males arriving in spring to the breeding site over four consecutive years. Although male spring arrival date was significantly repeatable (R = 0.24 +/- 0.08 SE), most was attributable to permanent environmental effects, while the additive genetic variance and heritability were very low (h(2) = 0.03 +/- 0.17 SE). This low value constrains species evolutionary adaptation, and our study adds to warnings that such populations may be threatened, e.g. by ongoing climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available