4.3 Article

Comparison of obstetrician-gynecologists and family physicians regarding weight-related attitudes, communication, and bias

Journal

OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 351-356

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.04.010

Keywords

Obesity; Bias; Education; Physician attitudes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a survey study comparing OB-GYN and family physicians, it was found that OB-GYNs had more negative perceptions and greater weight bias towards obese patients compared to FPs. This highlights the need for improved education in obesity management and bias reduction in OB-GYN training programs.
Objectives: To assess physician perceptions regarding weight-related communication, quality of care, and bias in obstetrics-gynecology (OBGYN) and family physician (FP) practices. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study based on a convenient sampling of OBGYN and FP was conducted. Physicians completed a 40-question survey assessing perceived obesity management and weight bias in caring for female patients with body mass index >= 25 kg/m(2). Results: Reponses from 51 physicians (25 OBGYN and 26 FP) were received. There was no difference between specialties in satisfaction with care or level of confidence in treating patients with obesity. However, OBGYNs reported more negative perceptions of patients with obesity (mean score 19.2 +/- 3.3 vs. 15.0 +/- 4.0, p < 0.001) and greater weight bias (11.8 +/- 2.0 vs. 9.7 +/- 2.5, p < 0.01) compared to FPs. OBGYNs were also more likely to expect less favorable treatment outcomes (13.3 +/- 2.5 vs. 15.5 +/- 2.8. p < 0.01). Physicians between 31 50 years old displayed a significantly higher perception of weight bias in their profession when compared to the reference 21-30 year olds, and for each unit increase in self-reported BMI there was a 0.18 average increase in the composite score for perceived weight bias. Conclusions: OBGYN physicians reported significantly higher levels of weight bias than FP physicians, indicating a need for improved education in OBGYN training. Clinical trial registration: N/A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available