4.3 Article

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Six-Month Intervention Study of Soy Protein Isolate in Men with Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 555-564

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2021.1903949

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 CA072290, P50 CA16087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence suggests that soy protein supplementation may not have a significant effect on PSA levels in prostate cancer patients, and the results of this study are consistent with most reports in the literature regarding the impact of soy and soy isoflavones on PSA.
There is evidence to suggest that soy may be beneficial for prostate cancer patients, but few randomized trials have addressed this. We examined the effect of 6-8 mo soy protein supplementation on prostate specific antigen (PSA) serum levels in men who recurred (PSA > 0.1 ng/ml) within three years of prostatectomy. Sixteen men were randomized to 20 g soy protein (similar to 24-26/day genistein; similar to 40-43/day total isoflavones) or casein placebo. PSA was measured at base line and at 1, 2, 4, and 6-8 mo. Serum genistein levels greatly increased from baseline and cholesterol decreased in the soy group. In both treatment arms PSA increased similarly and PSA doubling times were not different over the 6-8 mo study duration. Two subjects in each group had stable PSA. A literature search for clinical studies of soy, isoflavones, and PSA revealed that supplementation with soy or isoflavones did not affect PSA in virtually all clinical studies identified. Although this study is too small to draw a definitive conclusion on the effect of soy protein on PSA in men with biochemical failure, the null finding in this study is consistent with the results of virtually all reports of soy and soy isoflavones in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available