4.5 Article

Feasibility of substituting handgrip strength for muscle mass as a constituent standard in the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition for diagnosing malnutrition in patients with gastrointestinal cancers

Journal

NUTRITION
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.111044

Keywords

Malnutrition; GLIM; Handgrip strength; Skeletal muscle mass; Gastrointestinal cancer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81800795, 81770884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated that handgrip strength can be used as a substitute for muscle mass in the diagnostic criteria of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) for patients with gastrointestinal cancer, showing consistency and diagnostic value.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of substituting handgrip strength (HGS) for muscle mass as a constituent in the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) to diagnose malnourished patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Methods: The study included 2209 patients diagnosed with GI cancer from two centers. All patients were evaluated for nutritional risk using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 within 24 h of admission. The GLIM consensus was then used to diagnose malnourished patients. The evaluation of muscle mass as one of the constituents contained in the GLIM consensus was measured by computed tomography presented as skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and HGS, respectively. Consistency test was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic value of SMI and HGS. Results: There were 1042 (47.2%) cases of gastric cancer and 1167 (52.8%) cases of colorectal cancer. Among these cases were 768 patients (34.8%) at nutritional risk. Furthermore, 603 (27.3%) and 593 patients (26.8%) were diagnosed with malnutrition in the GLIM (SMI) group and the GLIM (HGS) group, respectively, and 544 (24.6%) patients in the two groups overlapped. The consistency test results showed that the K value in the GLIM (HGS) group compared with the GLIM (SMI) group was 0.881 (P < 0.001) in patients with gastric cancer and 0.872 (P < 0.001) in those with colorectal cancer. Conclusion: HGS can be a substitute for muscle mass as a constituent in the diagnostic criteria of GLIM in patients with GI cancer. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available