4.8 Article

Computational meta-analysis of ribosomal RNA fragments: potential targets and interaction mechanisms

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 4085-4103

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab190

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R15CA220059]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-2027611]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in cells generates a large amount of rRNA fragments (rRFs), which were discovered in Argonaute complexes. The rRFs may non-randomly pair with cellular transcripts and are widely distributed in the cytoplasm and nucleus in mice.
The most abundant cellular RNA species, ribosomal RNA (rRNA), appears to be a source of massive amounts of non-randomly generated fragments. We found rRNA fragments (rRFs) in immunoprecipitated Argonaute (Ago-IP) complexes in human and mouse cells and in small RNA sequencing datasets. In human Ago1-IP, guanine-rich rRFs were preferentially cut in single-stranded regions of mature rRNAs between pyrimidines and adenosine, and non-randomly paired with cellular transcripts in crosslinked chimeras. Numerous identical rRFs were found in the cytoplasm and nucleus in mouse Ago2-IP. We report specific interaction motifs enriched in rRF-target pairs. Locations of such motifs on rRFs were compatible with the Ago structural features and patterns of the Ago-RNA crosslinking in both species. Strikingly, many of these motifs may bind to double-stranded regions on target RNAs, suggesting a potential pathway for regulating translation by unwinding mRNAs. Occurring on either end of rRFs and matching intronic, untranslated or coding regions in targets, such interaction sites extend the concept of microRNA seed regions. Targeting both borders of certain short introns, rRFs may be involved in their biogenesis or function, facilitated by Ago. Frequently dismissed as noise, rRFs are poised to greatly enrich the known functional spectrum of small RNA regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available