4.6 Article

Effect of different tungsten compound reinforcements on the electromagnetic radiation shielding properties of neopentyl glycol polyester

Journal

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 1642-1651

Publisher

KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2020.11.006

Keywords

Electromagnetic radiation; Radiation shielding; Composite shielding; Tungsten; Neopentyl glycol polyester

Funding

  1. Mugla Sitki Kocman University [2014/016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study prepared tungsten composites based on NPG-PES as alternative shielding materials for IEMR, characterized their structure and performed gamma spectrometric analysis. The produced composites showed comparable or even better shielding performance than lead, indicating they could be a potential alternative to lead shieldings.
In this study, isophtalic neopentyl glycol polyester (NPG-PES) based composites with different loading ratios of pure tungsten metal (W), tungsten (VI) oxide (WO3), tungsten boron (WB) and tungsten carbide (WC) composites were prepared as alternative shielding materials for ionizing electromagnetic radiation (IEMR) shielding. Structural characterizations of the composites were done. Gamma spectrometric analysis of composites for 80-2000 keV energy range was performed and their usability as IEMR shielding was discussed. As a result, the produced composites showed a shielding performance of 60-100% of the lead (the most widely used IEMR shielding material) depending on the reinforcement material, reinforcement loading rate and experimental conditions. Thus, it was reported that produced composites could be an alternative to lead shieldings that have several disadvantages as toxic properties, difficulty of processing and inelasticity. (C) 2020 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available