4.5 Article

Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis in a Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion-advection model with time delay effect

Journal

NONLINEARITY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 3271-3313

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/abe77a

Keywords

competition-diffusion-advection; delay; stability; Hopf bifurcation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11871475]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2020zzts040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates a classical two-species Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion-advection model with time delay effect. It proves the existence of at least one spatially nonhomogeneous positive steady state and analyzes its local stability and Hopf bifurcation. The global stability of the positive steady state is also studied in the absence of time delay. The stability and direction of Hopf bifurcation are derived by introducing a weighted inner product associated with the advection rate, based on the idea of Chen et al (2018).
In this paper, we consider a classical two-species Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion-advectionmodelwith time delay effect. By utilizing the implicit function theorem, we obtain the existence of at least one spatially nonhomogeneous positive steady state under some conditions on parameters. By analyzing the corresponding characteristic equation, we show the local stability of this spatially nonhomogeneous positive steady state and the occurrence of Hopf bifurcation from it. When there is no time delay, we also study the global stability of the positive steady state. Based on the idea of Chen et al (2018 J. Differ. Equ. 264 5333-5359), the stability and direction of Hopf bifurcation are derived by introducing a weighted inner product associated with the advection rate. Finally, numerical simulations are carried out to verify the theoretical analysis results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available