4.7 Review

Why and how the brain weights contributions from a mixture of experts

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 14-23

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.022

Keywords

Cognitive control; Prefrontal cortex; Basal ganglia; Theoretical neuroscience; Decision-making

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Mental Health [R01MH11425, R01MH121089, R21MH120805, P50MH094258]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA040011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brain is proposed to act as a Mixture of Experts, with different expert systems proposing action strategies based on reliability. The anterior prefrontal cortex is suggested to play a specific role in this process, favoring simpler expert systems. Research indicates that this reliability-based control mechanism may be domain general.
It has long been suggested that human behavior reflects the contributions of multiple systems that cooperate or compete for behavioral control. Here we propose that the brain acts as a Mixture of Experts in which different expert systems propose strategies for action. It will be argued that the brain determines which experts should control behavior at any one moment in time by keeping track of the reliability of the predictions within each system, and by allocating control over behavior in a manner that depends on the relative reliabilities across experts. fMRI and neurostimulation studies suggest a specific contribution of the anterior prefrontal cortex in this process. Further, such a mechanism also takes into consideration the complexity of the expert, favoring simpler over more cognitively complex experts. Results from the study of different expert systems in both experiential and social learning domains hint at the possibility that this reliability-based control mechanism is domain general, exerting control over many different expert systems simultaneously in order to produce sophisticated behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available