4.8 Review

How does hemispheric specialization contribute to human-defining cognition?

Journal

NEURON
Volume 109, Issue 13, Pages 2075-2090

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.024

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society (MPG)
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  3. Canada CIFAR Artificial Intelligence Chairs program
  4. Healthy Brains, Healthy Lives initiative (CFREF)
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  6. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  7. Google

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The uniquely human cognitive faculties arise from flexible interactions between specific neural modules, with hemispheric asymmetries in functional specialization. These computational design principles support some of the most advanced cognitive operations, such as semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and language communication. The integration of dual-processing theories with the global workspace theory can explain the dynamic relay of information products between different cognitive systems.
Uniquely human cognitive faculties arise from flexible interplay between specific local neural modules, with hemispheric asymmetries in functional specialization. Here, we discuss how these computational design principles provide a scaffold that enables some of the most advanced cognitive operations, such as semantic understanding of world structure, logical reasoning, and communication via language. We draw parallels to dual-processing theories of cognition by placing a focus on Kahneman's System 1 and System 2. We propose integration of these ideas with the global workspace theory to explain dynamic relay of information products between both systems. Deepening the current understanding of how neurocognitive asymmetry makes humans special can ignite the next wave of neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available