4.7 Article

Fibre-specific laterality of white matter in left and right language dominant people

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117812

Keywords

Laterality; Asymmetry; Language; Diffusion MR; Fixel-based analysis; White matter

Funding

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen [G.0114.16N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Language is predominantly lateralised to the left hemisphere in over 90% of the population. Research using fixel-based analysis found a consistent pattern of white matter lateralisation, with the arcuate fasciculus showing leftward lateralisation regardless of functional language dominance. In addition, a significant group difference in lateralisation was observed in the forceps minor, with leftward lateralisation in the LLD group and rightward lateralisation in the RLD group.
Language is the most commonly described lateralised cognitive function, relying more on the left hemisphere compared to the right hemisphere in over 90% of the population. Most research examining the structure-function relationship of language lateralisation only included people showing a left language hemisphere dominance. In this work, we applied a state-of-the-art fixel-based analysis approach, allowing statistical analysis of white matter micro- and macrostructure on a fibre-specific level in a sample of participants with left and right language dominance (LLD and RLD). Both groups showed a similar extensive pattern of white matter lateralisation including a comparable leftwards lateralisation of the arcuate fasciculus, regardless of their functional language lateralisation. These results suggest that lateralisation of language functioning and the arcuate fasciculus are driven by independent biases. Finally, a significant group difference of lateralisation was detected in the forceps minor, with a leftwards lateralisation in LLD and rightwards lateralisation for the RLD group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available