4.6 Article

A learning-based view extrapolation method for axial super-resolution

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 455, Issue -, Pages 229-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.056

Keywords

Light field; Refocus precision; View extrapolation; Convolutional network; Axial resolution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871319, 62031023]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan of Shaanxi Province [2019JM221]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201808610055]
  4. EU H2020 Research and Innovation Programme [694122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a learning-based method to extrapolate novel views from axial volumes, leading to more accurate refocusing results without the need for accurate depth estimation. Experimental results show that the method works well for light fields with small baselines as well as those with larger baselines.
Axial light field resolution refers to the ability to distinguish features at different depths by refocusing. The axial refocusing precision corresponds to the minimum distance in the axial direction between two distinguishable refocusing planes. High refocusing precision can be essential for some light field applications like microscopy. In this paper, we propose a learning-based method to extrapolate novel views from axial volumes of sheared epipolar plane images (EPIs). As extended numerical aperture (NA) in classical imaging, the extrapolated light field gives re-focused images with a shallower depth of field (DOF), leading to more accurate refocusing results. Most importantly, the proposed approach does not need accurate depth estimation. Experimental results with both synthetic and real light fields show that the method not only works well for light fields with small baselines as those captured by plenoptic cameras (especially for the plenoptic 1.0 cameras), but also applies to light fields with larger baselines. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available