4.7 Article

How to teach neural networks to mesh: Application on 2-D simplicial contours

Journal

NEURAL NETWORKS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 152-179

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.12.019

Keywords

Mesh generation; Simplicial mesh; Neural networks; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PZENP2_166865]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZENP2_166865] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a machine learning meshing scheme for 2-D simplicial mesh generation based on predictions made by neural networks. Results show that the scheme is accurate and reliable in producing high-quality meshes, encouraging its adaptation for 3-D mesh generation.
A machine learning meshing scheme for the generation of 2-D simplicial meshes is proposed based on the predictions of neural networks. The data extracted from meshed contours are utilized to train neural networks which are used to approximate the number of vertices to be inserted inside the contour cavity, their location, and connectivity. The accuracy of the scheme is evaluated by comparing the quality of the mesh generated by the neural networks with that generated by a reference mesher. Based on an element quality metric, after conducting tests on contours for a various number of edges, the results show a maximum average deviation of 15.2% on the mean quality and 27.3% on the minimum quality between the elements of the meshes generated by the scheme and the ones generated from the reference mesher; the scheme is able to produce good quality meshes that are suitable for meshing purposes. The meshing scheme is also applied to generate larger scale meshes with a recursive implementation. The findings encourage the adaption of the scheme for 3-D mesh generation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available