4.7 Article

Recipient factors in faecal microbiota transplantation: one stool does not fit all

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 503-513

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41575-021-00441-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence National de Recherche [ANR-17-CE15-0019-01]
  2. AFA (Association Francois Aupetit)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows varying efficacy in treating different diseases. Sokol and colleagues discuss the relevance of recipient factors, such as inflammation, immunity, and genetics, in influencing the success of FMT.
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising therapy for chronic diseases associated with gut microbiota alterations. FMT cures 90% of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections. However, in complex diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic syndrome, its efficacy remains variable. It is accepted that donor selection and sample administration are key determinants of FMT success, yet little is known about the recipient factors that affect it. In this Perspective, we discuss the effects of recipient parameters, such as genetics, immunity, microbiota and lifestyle, on donor microbiota engraftment and clinical efficacy. Emerging evidence supports the possibility that controlling inflammation in the recipient intestine might facilitate engraftment by reducing host immune system pressure on the newly transferred microbiota. Deciphering FMT engraftment rules and developing novel therapeutic strategies are priorities to alleviate the burden of chronic diseases associated with an altered gut microbiota such as inflammatory bowel disease. The efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of a range of diseases varies. In this Perspective, Sokol and colleagues discuss the relevance of various recipient factors that influence faecal microbiota transplantation success such as inflammation, immunity and genetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available