4.7 Article

Single-cell atlas of early human brain development highlights heterogeneity of human neuroepithelial cells and early radial glia

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 584-594

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-00794-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through single-cell RNA sequencing, nine progenitor populations at the earliest stages of human brain development were identified, including a highly prevalent mesenchymal-like population that disappears once neurogenesis begins. Comparison with mouse progenitor populations revealed two clusters enriched in the early stages of human cortical development. Organoid systems displayed low fidelity to neuroepithelial and early radial glia cell types, but improved as neurogenesis progressed.
The human cortex comprises diverse cell types that emerge from an initially uniform neuroepithelium that gives rise to radial glia, the neural stem cells of the cortex. To characterize the earliest stages of human brain development, we performed single-cell RNA-sequencing across regions of the developing human brain, including the telencephalon, diencephalon, midbrain, hindbrain and cerebellum. We identify nine progenitor populations physically proximal to the telencephalon, suggesting more heterogeneity than previously described, including a highly prevalent mesenchymal-like population that disappears once neurogenesis begins. Comparison of human and mouse progenitor populations at corresponding stages identifies two progenitor clusters that are enriched in the early stages of human cortical development. We also find that organoid systems display low fidelity to neuroepithelial and early radial glia cell types, but improve as neurogenesis progresses. Overall, we provide a comprehensive molecular and spatial atlas of early stages of human brain and cortical development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available