A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2

Terrestrial ecosystems remove about 30 per cent of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted by human activities each year(1), yet the persistence of this carbon sink depends partly on how plant biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks respond to future increases in atmospheric CO2 (refs.(2,3)). Although plant biomass often increases in elevated CO2 (eCO(2)) experiments(4-6), SOC has been observed to increase, remain unchanged or even decline(7). The mechanisms that drive this variation across experiments remain poorly understood, creating uncertainty in climate projections(8,9). Here we synthesized data from 108 eCO(2) experiments and found that the effect of eCO(2) on SOC stocks is best explained by a negative relationship with plant biomass: when plant biomass is strongly stimulated by eCO(2), SOC storage declines; conversely, when biomass is weakly stimulated, SOC storage increases. This trade-off appears to be related to plant nutrient acquisition, in which plants increase their biomass by mining the soil for nutrients, which decreases SOC storage. We found that, overall, SOC stocks increase with eCO(2) in grasslands (8 +/- 2 per cent) but not in forests (0 +/- 2 per cent), even though plant biomass in grasslands increase less (9 +/- 3 per cent) than in forests (23 +/- 2 per cent). Ecosystem models do not reproduce this trade-off, which implies that projections of SOC may need to be revised.

Automated summary

Analysis of eCO2 experiments shows that the impact on SOC storage is best explained by a negative relationship with plant biomass, leading to a trade-off between different ecosystems. This highlights the need to revise projections of SOC in climate models.