4.6 Article

Atomic layer deposited nickel sulfide for bifunctional oxygen evolution/reduction electrocatalysis and zinc-air batteries

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 27, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abf26f

Keywords

nickel sulfide; atomic layer deposition; Zn− air batteries

Funding

  1. NSFC [51961165105, 51672011]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020B1515120039]
  3. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20180302150402760, JCYJ20200109110628172]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel non-precious NiS(x)/CNT electrocatalyst, which enhances the kinetics of oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions in zinc-air batteries, resulting in improved battery performance.
Rechargeable Zn-air batteries are a promising type of metal-air batteries for high-density energy storage. However, their practical use is limited by the use of costly noble-metal electrocatalysts for the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) occurred at the air electrode of the Zn-air batteries. This work reports a new non-precious bifunctional OER/ORR electrocatalyst of NiS (x) /carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which is made by atomic layer deposition (ALD) of nickel sulfide (NiS (x) ) on CNTs, for the applications for the air electrode of the Zn-air batteries. The NiS (x) /CNT electrocatalyst on a carbon cloth electrode exhibits a low OER overpotential of 288 mV to reach 10 mA cm(-2) in current density, and the electrocatalyst on a rotating disk electrode exhibits a half-wave ORR potential of 0.81 V in alkaline electrolyte. With the use of the NiS (x) /CNT electrocatalyst for the air electrode, the fabricated aqueous rechargeable Zn-air batteries show a fairly good maximum output power density of 110 mW cm(-2), which highlights the great promise of the ALD NiS (x) /CNT electrocatalyst for Zn-air batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available