4.8 Article

Ultralow Thermal Conductivity in Two-Dimensional MoO3

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 4351-4356

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00935

Keywords

two-dimensional materials; thermal conductivity; anharmonicity; phonon scattering; bending rigidity; ab initio calculations

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680127]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515110838, 2021A1515011688]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [RCBS20200714114919142]
  4. DFG [FR-2833/7]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1930402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using first-principles calculations and theoretical framework, it was found that monolayer molybdenum trioxide has record low thermal conductivity due to soft flexural and in-plane acoustic modes combined with strong bonding anharmonicity. These insights can guide the search for 2D materials with low thermal conductivity and motivate measurements for potential applications in thermoelectricity and thermal protection.
Monolayer molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) is an emerging two-dimensional (2D) material with high electrical conductivity but unexplored thermal conductivity. Using first-principles calculations and a Boltzmann transport theoretical framework, we predict a record low room-temperature phonon thermal conductivity (kappa(p)) of 1.57 and 1.26 W/mK along the principal in-plane directions of the MoO3 monolayer. The behavior is attributed to the combination of soft flexural and in-plane acoustic modes, which are coupled through the finite layer thickness, and to the strong bonding anharmonicity, which gives rise to significant 3- and 4-phonon scattering. These insights suggest new indicators for guiding the search of 2D materials with low kappa(p) and motivates kappa(p) measurements in MoO3 and its applications as a thermoelectric and thermally protective material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available