4.8 Article

Hollow Spherical Superstructure of Carbon Nanosheets for Bifunctional Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Electrocatalysis

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 3640-3648

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00757

Keywords

oxygen reduction reaction; oxygen evolution reaction; metal-organic frameworks; superstructure; Zn-air batteries

Funding

  1. AIST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile morphology regulation strategy was reported for synthesizing a spherical superstructure of MOF nanosheets, which were further pyrolyzed to fabricate carbon-based materials with abundant mesopores and metal-based nanoparticles. The obtained composites exhibited outstanding bifunctional activity for oxygen reduction/evolution reactions and great performances in Zn-air batteries.
The pyrolysis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) is an ingenious way to synthesize carbon-based materials with unique morphology for various applications including electrocatalysis. In this work, we reported a facile morphology regulation strategy for the synthesis of a spherical superstructure of MOF nanosheets. The use of metal hydroxide nanosheets on Zn particles as precursors/templates allowed MOFs with general polyhedron shape to form nanosheets and assemble into a spherical superstructure in the ligand solution. Further, a hollow spherical superstructure of carbon nanosheets decorated with metal-based nanoparticles was fabricated through the pyrolysis of MOF nanosheet superstructures at 950 degrees C, where the substrate/template Zn particle cores were evaporated away. The obtained composites possess carbon-based superstructures with abundant mesopores and metal-based nanoparticles with rich alloy/oxide interfaces. These features endow this MOF-derived carbon-based material with outstanding bifunctional activity for oxygen reduction/evolution reactions and great performances in Zn-air batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available