4.6 Article

Intronic Haplotypes in the GBA Gene Do Not Predict Age at Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1456-1460

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.28616

Keywords

Parkinson' s; GBA; haplotypes; intronic variants; genetics

Funding

  1. Celgene
  2. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
  3. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  5. Pfizer
  6. Sanofi
  7. Verily
  8. National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  9. philanthropy
  10. National Institutes of Health
  11. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health
  12. MRC [MR/M006646/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through studying a large cohort, we found that GBA haplotypes do not affect age at diagnosis of PD.
Background GBA mutations are a common risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD). A recent study has suggested that GBA haplotypes, identified by intronic variants, can affect age at diagnosis of PD. Objectives In this study, we assess this hypothesis using long reads across a large cohort and the publicly available Accelerating Medicines Partnership-Parkinson's Disease (AMP-PD) cohort. Methods We recruited a PD cohort through the Remote Assessment of Parkinsonism Supporting Ongoing Development of Interventions in Gaucher Disease study (RAPSODI) and sequenced GBA using Oxford Nanopore technology. Genetic and clinical data on the full AMP-PD cohort were obtained from the online portal of the consortium. Results A total of 1417 participants were analyzed. There was no significant difference in age at PD diagnosis between the two main haplotypes of the GBA gene. Conclusions GBA haplotypes do not affect age at diagnosis of PD in the two independent cohorts studied. (c) 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available