4.7 Article

Characterization of lensing selection effects for LISA massive black hole binary mergers

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 504, Issue 3, Pages 3610-3618

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1130

Keywords

gravitational waves; gravitational lensing: weak; black hole mergers

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method is presented to study lensing of gravitational wave sources, with an introduced irreducible bias induced by selection effects which affects the reconstruction of luminosity distance.
We present a method to include lensing selection effects due to the finite horizon of a given detector when studying lensing of gravitational wave (GW) sources. When selection effects are included, the mean of the magnification distribution is shifted from one to higher values for sufficiently high-redshift sources. This introduces an irreducible (multiplicative) bias on the luminosity distance reconstruction, in addition to the typical source of uncertainty in the distance determination. We apply this method to study lensing of GWs emitted by massive black hole binary mergers at high redshift detectable by Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). We estimate the expected bias induced by selection effects on the luminosity distance reconstruction as function of cosmological redshift, and discuss its implications for cosmological and astrophysical analyses with LISA. We also reconstruct the distribution of lensing magnification as a function of the observed luminosity distance to a source, which is the observable quantity in the absence of an electromagnetic counterpart. Lensing provides the dominant source of errors in distance measurements of high-redshift GW sources. Its full characterization, including the impact of selection effects, is of paramount importance to correctly determine the astrophysical properties of the underlying source population and to be able to use GW sources as a new cosmological probe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available