4.7 Article

Modelling synchrotron self-Compton and Klein-Nishina effects in gamma-ray burst afterglows

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 504, Issue 1, Pages 528-542

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab911

Keywords

radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; relativistic processes; methods: numerical; gamma-ray burst: general

Funding

  1. NASA Astrophysical Theory Program [80NSSC18K0566]
  2. Chandra X-ray Center
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF5076]
  4. NASA [NAS803060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we implemented a self-consistent way of modeling synchrotron self-Compton effects in gamma-ray burst afterglows using the afterglow modeling code boxfit. We found that considering these effects is crucial for accurately fitting X-ray light curves and deriving physical parameters. The inclusion of synchrotron self-Compton effects may significantly impact previous broad-band modeling efforts and physical parameter distributions.
We present an implementation of a self-consistent way of modelling synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) effects in gamma-ray burst afterglows, with and without approximated Klein-Nishina suppressed scattering for the afterglow modelling code boxfit, which is currently based on pure synchrotron emission. We discuss the changes in spectral shape and evolution due to SSC effects, and comment on how these changes affect physical parameters derived from broad-band modelling. We show that SSC effects can have a profound impact on the shape of the X-ray light curve using simulations including these effects. This leads to data that cannot be simultaneously fit well in both the X-ray and radio bands when considering synchrotron-only fits, and an inability to recover the correct physical parameters, with some fitted parameters deviating orders of magnitude from the simulated input parameters. This may have a significant impact on the physical parameter distributions based on previous broad-band modelling efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available