4.7 Article

The Thousand-Pulsar-Array programme on MeerKAT - V. Scattering analysis of single-component pulsars

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 504, Issue 1, Pages 1115-1128

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab980

Keywords

scattering; pulsars: general; ISM: structure

Funding

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/R505006/1]
  2. STFC [ST/000488]
  3. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT190100155]
  4. ADACS
  5. gravitational wave data centre via AAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study measured the scattering time-scale and spectral index for 84 single-component pulsars, identifying possible causes of inaccurate measurements and their consequences, and established a model to explain the consistency of the data.
We have measured the scattering time-scale, tau, and the scattering spectral index, alpha, for 84 single-component pulsars. Observations were carried out with the MeerKAT telescope as part of the Thousand-Pulsar-Array programme in the MeerTime project at frequencies between 0.895 and 1.670 GHz. Our results give a distribution of values for alpha (defined in terms of tau and frequency nu as tau proportional to nu(-alpha)) for which, upon fitting a Gaussian, we obtain a mean and standard deviation of alpha = 4.0 +/- 0.6. This is due to our identification of possible causes of inaccurate measurement of tau, which, if not filtered out of modelling results, tend to lead to underestimation of alpha. The pulsars in our sample have large dispersion measures and are therefore likely to be distant. We find that a model using an isotropic scatter broadening function is consistent with the data, likely due to the averaging effect of multiple scattering screens along the line of sight. Our sample of scattering parameters provides a strong data set upon which we can build to test more complex and time-dependent scattering phenomena, such as extreme scattering events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available