4.6 Article

Screening a Strain of Klebsiella sp. O852 and the Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for Trans-Dihydrocarvone Production

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092432

Keywords

Klebsiella sp. O852; limonene; biotransformation; trans-dihydrocarvone; optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671824]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662020SPPY002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discovered a new strain of Klebsiella sp. O852 capable of converting limonene to trans-dihydrocarvone, and optimized reaction parameters to increase the production of trans-dihydrocarvone. The content of trans-dihydrocarvone increased 16 times after optimization under specific conditions.
Flavors and fragrances have high commercial value in the food, cosmetic, chemical and pharmaceutical industries. It is interesting to investigate the isolation and characterization of new microorganisms with the ability to produce flavor compounds. In this study, a new strain of Klebsiella sp. O852 (accession number CCTCC M2020509) was isolated from decayed navel orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck), which was proved to be capable of converting limonene to trans-dihydrocarvone. Besides, the optimization of various reaction parameters to enhance the trans-dihydrocarvone production in shake flask was performed for Klebsiella sp. O852. The results showed that the yield of trans-dihydrocarvone reached up to 1 058 mg/L when Klebsiella sp. O852 was incubated using LB-M medium for 4 h at 36 degrees C and 150 rpm, and the biotransformation process was monitored for 36 h after adding 1680 mg/L limonene/ethanol (final ethanol concentration of 0.8% (v/v)). The content of trans-dihydrocarvone increased 16 times after optimization. This study provided a basis and reference for producing trans-dihydrocarvone by biotransformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available