4.6 Article

Insight into Gentisic Acid Antidiabetic Potential Using In Vitro and In Silico Approaches

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26071932

Keywords

gentisic acid; in silico; molecular docking; in vitro; DPP4; PTP1B; FFAR1; AldR; GP; α -amylase; PPAR-γ α -glucosidase

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the antidiabetic potential of gentisic acid (GA) and its mechanisms of action using in silico and in vitro approaches. The results indicated that GA moderately interacted with most receptors and had moderate inhibitory activity. Further in vivo studies are encouraged to confirm these findings.
Numerous scientific studies have confirmed the beneficial therapeutic effects of phenolic acids. Among them gentisic acid (GA), a phenolic acid extensively found in many fruit and vegetables has been associated with an enormous confirmed health benefit. The present study aims to evaluate the antidiabetic potential of gentisic acid and highlight its mechanisms of action following in silico and in vitro approaches. The in silico study was intended to predict the interaction of GA with eight different receptors highly involved in the management and complications of diabetes (dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4), protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1), aldose reductase (AldR), glycogen phosphorylase (GP), alpha-amylase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) and alpha-glucosidase), while the in vitro study studied the potential inhibitory effect of GA against alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase. The results indicate that GA interacted moderately with most of the receptors and had a moderate inhibitory activity during the in vitro tests. The study therefore encourages further in vivo studies to confirm the given results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available