4.7 Article

A SARS-CoV-2 targeted siRNA-nanoparticle therapy for COVID-19

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 2219-2226

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.05.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH [R01 113407-01]
  2. NIAID [R56 AI147684]
  3. MRFF [2001931]
  4. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health award [P30CA033572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a highly effective siRNA therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2 infection using a novel LNP delivery system, with the potential to significantly inhibit the virus in the lungs and provide a survival advantage to treated mice.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in humans. Despite several emerging vaccines, there remains no verifiable therapeutic targeted specifically to the virus. Here we present a highly effective small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2 infection using a novel lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery system. Multiple siRNAs targeting highly conserved regions of the SARS-CoV2 virus were screened, and three candidate siRNAs emerged that effectively inhibit the virus by greater than 90% either alone or in combination with one another. We simultaneously developed and screened two novel LNP formulations for the delivery of these candidate siRNA therapeutics to the lungs, an organ that incurs immense damage during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Encapsulation of siRNAs in these LNPs followed by in vivo injection demonstrated robust repression of virus in the lungs and a pronounced survival advantage to the treated mice. Our LNP-siRNA approaches are scalable and can be administered upon the first sign of SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. We suggest that an siRNA-LNP therapeutic approach could prove highly useful in treating COVID-19 disease as an adjunctive therapy to current vaccine strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available